Secondary effects of COVID-19 on pharma, healthcare and patients

Reminders of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our healthcare system, economy, and day-to-day lives are everywhere. To date, most of the focus has understandably been on the immediate effects of the virus and the efforts to enforce physical distancing and develop a vaccine. However, we are getting to the point where we need to start considering the long-term effects on the healthcare system when making decisions.

Long-term physical effects

Delays and cancellations of elective procedures are already resulting in backlogs that could take years to clear. Delaying surgeries such as joint replacements, along with complementary services such as physiotherapy, could result in the patients’ conditions deteriorating to the point where they will require substantially more medical resources in the future than if they had undergone surgery and received physical rehabilitation in a timely manner. Further, some “semi-elective” surgeries, including for haematological and thoracic cancers, are being delayed on a case-to-case-basis, with potentially disastrous results.

There are also delays in routine cancer screenings such as pap smears, mammograms, and colonoscopies. This is likely to result in higher rates of late-stage cancers being diagnosed post-COVID-19. Since early detection of cancer is by far the best way to beat it, we have to prepare for higher numbers of cancer-related hospitalisations and deaths in the medium-term future.

In general, family doctors and paediatricians are seeing fewer patients right now, and even if patients have access to a doctor, many choose to stay home unless there is an emergency. As a result, worrying declines in routine vaccinations have been reported in the US and elsewhere.

“Whether or not there will be a second wave of COVID-19 itself, there will undoubtedly be a second wave of physical and mental health issues, and we need to start preparing for this now”

Even before this pandemic, we were seeing clusters of measles cases in certain countries where vaccination rates were low. With COVID-19, the rates are set to dip below those required for herd immunity in many parts of the world. Even after there is a vaccine for COVID-19, we may be stuck fighting polio again. It’s a scary thought, but advanced planning will be key to stay on top of these secondary effects of the pandemic.

Mental health aspects

In addition to the above, we are already seeing the acute effects of COVID-19 on the mental health of both healthcare providers and other frontline workers, and on the general population. The rates of PTSD, anxiety, and depression are likely to keep rising the longer lockdowns are enforced. Related stressors such as fear of becoming sick, sudden unemployment, or having to home-school young children will only add fuel to the fire. Although we may never know the true rates, we can assume that domestic violence is increasing during quarantine, causing further emotional trauma.

There may also be a risk of healthcare providers lumping all mental health disorders under a “post-COVID-19” umbrella. Underlying or co-morbid conditions could become harder to diagnose. Whether or not there will be a second wave of COVID-19 itself, there will undoubtedly be a second wave of physical and mental health issues, and we need to start preparing for this now.

What can be done?

It is clear that all stakeholders, including governments and hospital administrators, need to work together to minimise the long-term effects on the healthcare system and patients. It can be argued that, when relaxing physical distancing guidelines or lockdowns, reopening medical and allied health practices should be prioritised well before restaurants and beauty salons. Getting a mammogram or going to the dentist for a check-up might not be ‘essential’ in the same way as undergoing emergency surgery for an aneurysm. However, not doing those things for years can cause life-threatening conditions to go undiagnosed until it is too late.

For pharmaceutical companies that want to help their customers here and now, there are multiple approaches. The appetite for medical education on how to adapt clinical practice to COVID-19 and treat patients “virtually” remains high. Contrary to what many pharma representatives think, most healthcare providers (except those working directly with COVID-19 patients such as intensive care specialists) are actually less busy than pre-COVID-19. They welcome the opportunity to attend webinars or other types of online medical education events from home, and to be able to network and share best practices with colleagues from across the country.

The needs of healthcare providers and their patients during this time will vary greatly based on their conditions and the available treatments and resources. Therefore, to determine other ways that pharma can help, close (virtual) collaboration with not just expert KOLs but also community physicians, nurses, allied health professionals, and patients/caregivers is critical.

Lessons learned

Being a glass-half-full-person, I think it’s important that we don’t lose sight of the positives and the lessons learned in the last few months. The pandemic has shown that a lot of jobs can be done successfully (and often more effectively) on a remote basis. This will hopefully translate to more flexibility for workers in the future, especially those with physical disabilities or other health conditions, who have long advocated for work-from-home policies.

The rise in telehealth is another interesting side effect of the pandemic. Here in Canada, many provinces are introducing new billing codes for telehealth, and we are quickly learning about the pros and cons of telemedicine for different types of patients. From a physician’s perspective, there may be substantially lower rates of no-shows, and a follow-up appointment that would have taken 30 minutes in person can be done in less than 10 minutes over the phone.

From the patients’ perspective, being able to refill a prescription in 5 minutes without having to leave the house might mean that they don’t have to take several hours off of work, find a babysitter, or skip lunch.

Finally, the development of fully virtual congresses is another interesting outcome. Born out of necessity, many of these have actually been more successful than their in-person counterparts in terms of attendance and engagement. I predict that, as the technology keeps improving, we will see more virtual congresses, conferences, and other learning and training events, even after we are able to safely meet in person again.

About the author

Natalie YeadonNatalie Yeadon has over 18 years of experience working in several different roles in the pharmaceutical industry. Currently, she is the co-owner and managing director at Impetus Digital, where she helps life science clients connect and create sustained, authentic relationships with their key opinion leaders through a variety of best-in-class virtual collaboration tools.